Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

LIVE ENTERTAINMENT VS. CITY HALL

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

The Supervisors hearing room was packed to overflowing on Monday October 28th as nightlife’s supporters and detractors rallied to their respective causes.  This wasn’t even a Board of Supervisors meeting; it was a committee of three Supervisors: Bevan Dufty, the man who would be king; Eric Mar, a democrat in name only; and Chris Daly, the local press’s favorite whipping boy, (self-flagellation aside).

city-hall

SF Dept. of Over-Regulation

(more…)

ALASKA SENATOR SUPPORTS INTERNET USAGE FEES

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

Ted Stevens is known as the long-serving Alaskan Senator who escaped corruption charges when Justice Department prosecutors bungled what was apparently an air-tight case.  He needs to be better known as the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation who supports Internet usage fees.  The Chairman’s lack of technical comprehension shines in a speech about the “Innernets” which is on YouTube.  That speech has been remixed into this five-star video that has provided over 1 million people with a good laugh a Senator Peabrain’s expense.

YOSHI’S STINGS SF’S TAXPAYERS FOR $7.2 MILLION

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Yoshi's SFThe name Yoshi’s is synonymous with jazz in the Bay Area, so it was a surprise to find Dan Hicks and his Hot Licks with mando-man David Grisman, Rhett Miller from the country-influenced, alt-rock band the Old 97′s , and the The Waybacks performing back-to-back-to-back shows at Yoshi’s-SF over the last three days of March.  (more…)

CITY OF SF’S NARROW VIEW OF MUSIC AS ART

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

The City of San Francisco’s arts budget is funded by millions from a special hotel tax, but those who run San Francisco Grants for the Arts (SFGFTA) are making sure that not one dime of it gets to hillbillies, rockers, punks, rappers, sonic outlaws, struggling clubs or, heaven forbid, music’s cutting edge.  (more…)

HARVARD LAWYER FIGHTS FOR SONG SHARING

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

RIAA SatireThe Recording Industry Association of America regularly sends out thousands of greenmail compensation demands to the families of downloaders who are usually minors.  College students are favorite targets, but the RIAA never sets its lawyers upon Harvard students because it fears the heavy hitters in the university’s law school.  (See story.)  Harvard professor Charlie Nesson grew tired of waiting to take a crack at them so he’s taken the case of a non-Harvard student.

Charlie Nesson

Charlie Nesson

Boston.com summarizes some of the excitement over Nesson’s entry into the music downloading war: “’RIAA Litigation May Be Unconstitutional,’ headlined Slashdot, a self-described ’news for nerds’ website.  ’Harvard’s Charlie Nesson Raises Constitutional Questions in RIAA Litigation,’ trumpeted ZDNet Government.  ‘Insane Harvard Law Professor Promises MP3 Justice,’ proclaimed Gawker.”

The case involves Joel Tenenbaum a Boston University grad student who the RIAA has accused of downloading seven MP3 files.  The RIAA’s basic shakedown is for $3000-$5000 and a promise to stop downloading.  Most families cave in since they can’t afford to fight the RIAA over three to five grand, particularly since the digital copyright laws have been bought and paid for through the RIAA’s grease monkeys in Congress.  A song on iTunes costs $.99; the minimum fine for downloading from a P2P is $750 per song.

Nesson plans to try the RIAA in the court of public opinion first and in a court of law second.  Nesson is attacking the Digital Theft Deterrence Act of 1999 as overly punitive and unconstitutional because its cases can’t really be tried in courts.  The way the law is written, cases can only be rubber stamped in favor of the RIAA.  Techdirt has the full story and some hard-hitting quotes from Nesson’s brief.